Read the first pages of How We Got Here

This is not slavery. You have rights, and you have your plot. You have the lord’s protection against bandits and armies. But it is not freedom either. It sits somewhere in between: a bargain, a deal that lasted for centuries and shaped the lives of the vast majority of Europeans throughout the Middle Ages.

In this chapter we are going to understand that deal, because to see how capitalism was born, you first have to understand the system that came before it.

Land is everything

To understand feudalism you have to grasp one thing: in medieval Europe, land was everything. There were no factories and no big companies. Wealth was measured in acres, not in coins.

The system worked like a pyramid. At the top sat the king, who in theory owned all the land in the kingdom. But a king cannot farm an entire kingdom, so he handed out large tracts to his most powerful nobles. In exchange, those nobles swore loyalty to him and supplied soldiers in time of war. The land granted in this way was called a fief, in Latin feudum, which is where the word feudalism comes from.

The nobles, in turn, parceled out portions of their fiefs to lesser lords. And at the base of the pyramid, working the land, were the peasants. Most of them were serfs, legally bound to the land they worked.

They were not slaves. A slave is the property of a person; a serf is tied to a place. If the lord sold the land, the serfs went with it. They could not leave without permission, but neither could they be sold apart from the land. They had rights, customs that protected them, and a plot of their own to live on.

2

That arrangement should not be romanticized in either direction. It was not slavery, but it was not a free contract between equals either. The peasant had not chosen the lord or the terms, and the “protection” he received was largely protection from the violence of other lords just like his own. That said, for the people living under it, it was a stable and familiar order, with obligations running both ways: work and obedience in exchange for land and protection. It was an unspoken pact that held for centuries.

How a manor worked

The basic unit of the feudal economy was neither the town nor the kingdom. It was the manor, the lord’s estate.

A typical manor included the lord’s house or castle, the village where the peasants lived, the cropland, the pastures, the woods, and often a mill, an oven, and a church.

The fields were split in two. The demesne was farmed directly for the lord, and the peasants’ plots were worked by each family for its own keep. The compulsory, unpaid labor the serfs performed on the demesne was called the corvée, or labor service, and usually ran to two or three days a week. The rest of the time, the peasant worked his own land.

On top of the labor service, peasants paid the tithe, a tenth of their harvest for the Church. They also paid the lord fees to use the mill, the oven, or the press. The lord held a monopoly on those facilities. You could not grind your grain at home. You had to take it to the lord’s mill and pay for the privilege.

3

The goal of the whole system was self-sufficiency. A manor produced almost everything it needed: grain, meat, wool, timber, basic tools. Trade with the outside world was minimal, money circulated very little, and the economy was local and closed.

This deserves a pause, because it marks a deep difference from the world that came later. In a market economy, you produce one thing and sell it to buy everything else. On the feudal manor, each community tried to produce nearly everything it consumed directly. Medieval people were perfectly capable of trading. The system was simply designed to depend on exchange as little as possible.

The Conqueror’s inventory

In 1086, twenty years after conquering England, William the Conqueror did something without precedent. He sent inspectors into every corner of his new kingdom to catalog absolutely everything: every estate, every field, every head of livestock, every serf.

The result was the Domesday Book. The name means the book of the Day of Judgment, because, as people said at the time, its rulings were as final as those of the Last Judgment.

The Domesday Book is an extraordinary document. It tells us that England in 1086 had some 13,000 communities. It shows that the crown and about two hundred great lay lords held roughly three-quarters of the wealth, and the Church most of the rest. It records that slaves (servi, in the survey’s Latin) made up around 10 percent of the listed population, with dependent peasants accounting for a much larger share.

It is the first great economic inventory of a European country. What it reveals is a world where land is the basis of all power, all wealth, and all social organization, and where the market barely exists.

4

The plague that changed everything

Feudalism might have lasted much longer. But in 1347 something reached Europe that would change it for good: the Black Death.

Between 1347 and 1351, bubonic plague killed roughly a third of Europe’s population. In some regions it killed half. Whole villages were left empty.

The economic effect was devastating, though not in the way you might expect. With so many people dead, there was suddenly far less labor to go around. And when labor is scarce, its price goes up. The surviving peasants discovered they could demand better terms. If a lord did not pay enough, they moved to the next manor over, where the lord was desperate for workers.

Look closely at what is happening here, because it is an idea you will meet again and again in this book. The human tragedy was immense. Yet the very thing that caused it, a sudden shortage of people, changed the price of labor. The supply of hands collapsed while the demand remained, and the balance of power shifted toward those who worked the land. Nobody decided this. It emerged from millions of individual situations.

Lords and governments tried to resist. In England, the Statute of Labourers of 1351 tried to freeze wages at their pre-plague levels. It forbade peasants to ask for more and lords to offer more.

It did not work. The peasants rebelled. In 1381 the Peasants’ Revolt broke out in England, and thousands of laborers marched on London demanding an end to serfdom and the right to bargain freely over their wages.

The revolt was crushed. Its leader, Wat Tyler, was killed in the middle of negotiations. But the underlying cause could not be stopped. The shortage of labor had shifted the balance of power between lords and serfs for good.

5

In Western Europe, serfdom gradually faded away during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Peasants became day laborers working for a wage, or tenants paying rent in money. The feudal bargain was coming apart.

Oddly enough, the opposite happened in Eastern Europe. In Poland, Russia, and Prussia, serfdom hardened and did not disappear until the nineteenth century. The same plague produced opposite results, depending on each region’s institutions. That detail is worth holding on to, because it demolishes a comfortable idea: that history moves on its own in a single direction. No law of nature freed the peasants. Where lords were stronger and better organized, they used the same scarcity to bind people even more tightly to the land. Institutions, meaning the concrete rules of each place, matter as much as the great economic forces.

Freedom and security

For a peasant family in the thirteenth century, feudalism was not an abstraction. It was the whole of life.

It meant knowing that your children would work the same land you did. It meant that a bad harvest could starve them, while a good year would not make you any richer, because the surplus went to the lord and the Church. It meant that the horizon of your life was the village, and perhaps the next village over on market day. Nothing more.

But it also meant a kind of security within the hardship. You had a plot. You had the right to gather firewood in the common woods and to graze your animals on the common pastures. The lord was obliged to protect you. The community worked as a mutual support network in hard times.

6